#Mac pro 5.1 westmere upgrade#
#Mac pro 5.1 westmere software#
#Mac pro 5.1 westmere mac#

Note that 12 cores is 31 faster than 6 cores a significant benefit, especially compared to the dismal scalability of most of the other RAW converters.

PhaseOne Capture One Pro 5.1.2 convert to 16-bit uncompressed TIF.

#Mac pro 5.1 westmere mac#

It handles around 80 tracks on the Logic X benchmark.ДЄfter I get my 4,1 -> 5,1 12 core finished, I may dedicate the 3,1 to running the more efficient Logic 9.1.8 on an older version of OsX. Apple Mac Pro Westmere 4/6/8/12-Core (Aug 2010) Mac Pro Westmere RAW-file Import with Phase One Capture One. 4,1 Upgraded To 5,1 (Available to pick up at the store) Share Share on Facebook 0 Tweet Tweet on Twitter Pin it Pin on Pinterest 0 Fancy Add to Fancy +1 +1 on Google Plus. And a fantastic introduction to OsX and Logic. MAC PRO TOWER 3.46Ghz 6 CORE WESTMERE (Available to pick up at the store) MacPro-LA. I think an 8 core 3,1 mac pro w/ 32 GB RAM is a phenomenal machine for ~ $300. Details of the spec do matter, the part number you want for a 16GB pair is HP 413015-B21 or equivalent.ДЄn Airport Express card part type BCM94321MC from e-bay cost $10. This compatibility is important, because pairs of 8 GB Server ECC FB-DIMMs are currently available around $20-$30, that's 16GB. When using Logic they all run the same, around 62-69 deg C. The big heatsinks on Apple recommended FB-DIMMs are great, but in practice what I found is that replacing 4 of the massively heat-sunk 2 GB DIMMs (that run around 68 degrees C under memtest load) with flat-heatsink HP Server type DIMMs in slots A3, A4, B3, B4, I see them run at 72-76 degrees C under max memtest load, which is perfectly acceptable. The 3,1 mac pro's recommended 800 Mhz FB-DIMM RAM is vastly more expensive than the 667Mhz variety, but adds less than 4% performance.

#Mac pro 5.1 westmere upgrade#

Upgrade RAM is worth knowing about, Oh fellow lovers of The Cheap and the Good! It's not unusual to find base 3,1 's on Craigslist for ~ $200-300. The 12-core Mac Pro was 37 percent faster in our HandBrake test, 73 percent faster in our CineBench CPU test, for example.My guiding principle is that no computer is worth more than about $1000, well, OK, on occasion maybe $1500.ДЄn older 'late 2008 3,1 mac pro' is a very usable 8 core. Contains three (3) 4GB SDRAM memory modules that are specifically designed and SPD configured for the Nehelam and Westmere Mac Pro Models (3rd Generation). A 2.93GHz Core i7 quad-core iMac costs less than half as much as the 12-core Mac Pro, which was just 17 percent faster overall-almost all of the performance benefit of the 12-core Mac Pro was in our multi-processor savvy application tasks. 12GB DDRMHz SDRAM for Early 2009 to Mid 2010 Mac Pro Models 4.1 and 5.1 quad-core and 8-core. Looking at some BTO options on the iMac, however, the iMac fares better and costs considerably less. The 12-core Mac Pro was 34 percent faster, overall, than the 2009 8-core 2.26GHz Xeon Nehalem Mac Pro, and 42 percent faster than the 2009 quad-core 2.66GHz Xeon Nehalem Mac Pro.Д¬ompared to the high-end standard configuration 27-inch iMac with a 2.8GHz Core i5 quad-core processor, the 12-core Mac Pro was 33 percent faster overall. Testing the 12-core Mac Pro with 12GB of RAM (six 2GB DIMMs provided by Crucial) showed very little improvement over the 12-core Mac Pro with 6GB of RAM-just one Speedmark point. It was outperformed by a $3699 built-to-order (BTO) Mac Pro with a 3.33GHz 6-core Xeon Westmere processor, which was faster in 10 of our 17 tests, and matched the 12-core Mac ProвЂ™s scores in two other tests. If you replace the CPU with a Westmere 6-core X5680 or X5690, then you can probably get around 600-800, assuming the last officially supported OS is loaded. While the design of the Mac Pro is seemingly identical to its predecessors, the 2010 model is equipped with faster graphics and numeral updated technical differences than its Early 2009 equivalent. A native 5.1 is generally worth more than a 4.1 converted to a 5.1, but I definitely agree with u/vsandrei that a dual CPU model will fetch far more than a single CPU version. The new 12-core Mac Pro was 26 percent faster overall than the new low-end Mac Pro, a quad-core system running at 2.8GHz.ДЄs shown in our вЂњ Fastest Macs money can buyвЂќ report, the 12-core Mac Pro was not the overall speed king in our tests. The Apple Mac Pro 5,1 (Mid 2010) is a Mac desktop computer designed and developed by Apple Inc. The 12-core Mac ProвЂ™s Speedmark 6.5 score was 21 percent faster than the 8-core 2.4GHz Xeon Mac Pro, with a 52 percent higher MathematicaMark score, 36 percent faster CineBench R15 CPU score, and 19 percent faster HandBrake result. Results from HandBrake, CineBench CPU, and MathematicaMark (all using the available 24 virtual processing cores), were the fastest weвЂ™ve seen.

#Mac pro 5.1 westmere software#

With iMacs and lower-priced Mac Pros outperforming the 12-core model at many everyday tasks, it was only in the handful of high-end, specialized software tests that the 12-core Mac Pro shined. If the $5000 price didnвЂ™t give it away, our tests of the 12-core Mac Pro show that this Mac Pro is not meant for the average consumer.